Our mission is to serve audiences as a distinctive content source for information, insights and cultural experiences essential to living in our diverse, interconnected world.
Indian Country remembers the trauma of children taken from their parents
Indian Country Today
June 19, 2018 · 10:30 AM EDT
By Mark Trahant
A group of Chiracahua Apaches on their first day at Carlisle Indian school, 1886. “Separating children and their families to ‘kill the Indian to save the man’ by sending Native children to boarding schools, and doing it in the name of religion, is one generation removed from my family,” wrote Peggy Flanagan on Twitter. Flanagan, White Earth, is a candidate for lieutenant governor in Minnesota. “Trump’s ‘zero tolerance policy’ is nothing more than a clear violation of human rights. We must learn from history. We must stand with immigrants and refugees.” Credit: John N. Choate/MPI/Getty Images
Indian Country remembers. This is not the first administration to order the forced separation of families.
The Trump administration has initiated a zero-tolerance policy on the border. Zero tolerance means that people caught crossing the border are treated as criminals.
On Friday, the Department of Homeland Security said the Trump administration separated 1,995 children from the adults they were traveling with at the US border between April 19 and May 31.
“The act of ripping children away from their parents is nothing new for the United States. Separating children and their families to ‘kill the Indian to save the man’ by sending Native children to boarding schools, and doing it in the name of religion, is one generation removed from my family,” wrote Peggy Flanagan on Twitter. Flanagan, an Indigenous member of the White Earth Nation of Ojibwe, is a candidate for lieutenant governor in Minnesota. “Trump’s ‘zero tolerance policy’ is nothing more than a clear violation of human rights. We must learn from history. We must stand with immigrants and refugees.”
Many on social media referred to a piece in Indian Country Today by Mary Annette Pember in 2013, illustrated by a picture of tiny handcuffs.
From the piece: “For such small objects, the child’s handcuffs are surprisingly heavy when cradled in the palms of one’s hand. Although now rusted from years of disuse, they still convey the horror of their brutal purpose, which was to restrain Native children who were being brought to boarding schools. ‘I felt the weight of their metal on my heart,’ said Jessica Lackey of the Cherokee tribe as she described holding the handcuffs for the first time.”
Pember wrote that she had heard rumors about the existence of the handcuffs during visits to Haskell. Then Haskell agreed to allow a public viewing of the handcuffs. She wrote: “Andy Girty, one of the elders who first blessed the handcuffs when they were given to Haskell in 1989, helped unwrap them for me. Known as the Haskell Institute in its early years, the school opened its doors in 1884. It was originally founded as an instrument of the final solution to this country’s ‘Indian problem’; Haskell Institute’s mission then was embodied in the now infamous motto of Captain Richard H. Pratt, founder of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School: ‘Kill the Indian, Save the Man.’ This mindset led to decades of forced acculturation through brutal military-style incarceration cloaked as education in US Indian boarding schools.”
This tragic history is again public policy. And, as in previous public policy debates, the authorities rely on Christian scripture for their inhumane acts.
“The American people have been begging and pleading with our elected officials for an immigration system that is lawful and that serves our national interest — one that we can be proud of. There is nothing mean-spirited about that. They are right, decent and just to ask for this,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said last week. “We’ve got a choice here. We either have open borders or we have laws. It’s one or the other.”
Sessions, a Sunday School teacher, proclaimed: “I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order.”
Immigration is an issue that will surface again in Congress as soon as this week.
Republicans debate their own competing plans for immigration reform. The House will consider two bills: a conservative, hardline approach and a more moderate version. (Moderate among Republicans. The bill is unlikely to win votes from many Democrats.) A third bill, an actual moderate proposal, could only be brought to the floor with a discharge petition, the signatures of a majority of members. The House leadership’s immigration bill is designed to make sure that never happens.
But the division between Republicans (harsh across the board on immigration or mostly harsh on immigration) leaves Democrats out of the discourse, and therefore any bill is unlikely to become law.
The conservative bill is authored by House Judiciary chair Bob Goodlatte of Virginia. That bill includes funding a wall, further slowing legal immigration, and ending family reunification as a policy. The conservative approach does not address the family separation issue or any legal citizenship route for the dreamers, immigrants who came to this country as children.
The House leadership bill, according to a draft posted by Politico, calls for more border security, and a solution for DACA-eligible immigrants via a special visa. It also says it ends separation of families at the border.
Both bills restrict legal immigration and provide penalties for cities that support sanctuary policies.
Rep. Tom Cole, R-Oklahoma, a member of House leadership, told Axios that the only way this bill can happen is if Trump “leans in on it hard, he can make a huge difference.” The president is expected to meet with House Republicans this week.
Perhaps an immigration bill could pass in the House. But Senate Republicans would need votes from Democrats in order to prevent a filibuster — and that’s unlikely.
Meanwhile, over the weekend, Speaker Paul Ryan picked up more flack for the Trump policy of separation of children from their parents.
Singer John Legend attacked Ryan’s Father’s Day tweet. “Seriously, f–k you,” he tweeted. “Reunite the families at the border and we can talk about father’s day.”
Legend is not alone in his condemnation of the policy. Former First Lady Laura Bush wrote an op-ed against the policy in The Washington Post. “On Sunday, a day we as a nation set aside to honor fathers and the bonds of family, I was among the millions of Americans who watched images of children who have been torn from their parents,” she wrote. “People on all sides agree that our immigration system isn’t working, but the injustice of zero tolerance is not the answer. I moved away from Washington almost a decade ago, but I know there are good people at all levels of government who can do better to fix this.”
And there is one more parallel with Indian Country and the border policy of family separation. The president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Colleen Kraft, told Buzzfeed News that the separations will cause “irreparable harm to lifelong development by disrupting a child’s architecture. Immigration has become so politicized. We would really like people to sit back instead and think of the health of these children.”
She cited a list of physical and mental health issues. She said the research shows that children who are forcibly taken from their parents have demonstrated links to asthma, obesity and cancer, in addition to tendencies toward substance abuse, developmental delays and mental health issues.
One such study is a 2013 report in the Journal of Family Issues. Researchers looked at historical trauma “incurred by genocide (see United Nations definition, 1948) and the subsequent forced acculturation policies has been accumulating over the past decade to include affective states like anger, depression, guilt, and anxiety, internalized oppression, and feelings of inadequacy in parenting roles.”
The Intergenerational Effects of Relocation Policies on Indigenous Families by Melissa L. Walls, PhD, and Les B. Whitbeck, PhD, said that “government relocation policy of the 1950s provides a somewhat recent example of an acculturation policy. It affected a cohort of whom many still survive and affords the opportunity to measure the psychosocial impact of moving individuals from reservations to urban employment settings.”
The study found “a critical and widely documented aspect of intergenerational continuity concerns the mediating effects of parenting processes on parent-to-child transmissions of behavior and emotional well-being.”
A key point: “Generational ties are particularly valued because elders are viewed as repositories of cultural knowledge, spirituality, and traditional language. Their life experience is enormously respected, and they are turned to for direction and advice. When these linkages are disturbed the consequences ripple through subsequent generations.”
This story was published by Indian Country Today.
One more thing…
PRI takes a global approach to the news of the day. We help you understand how what happens around the world matters in Washington and in your neighborhood. Today more than ever, we need conversations, perspectives and diverse voices.
Japan executes leader, six followers of sarin attack doomesday cult
In New York, volunteers engage in a quiet form of advocacy for immigrants facing deportation
The government says Border Patrol agents in the Southwest speak Spanish — but many migrants speak Indigenous languages
Egyptian court delays verdict in mass trial over Rabaa sit-in
Justice Kennedy, US Supreme Court’s pivotal vote, to retire
Berlin’s first Arabic-language public library aims to redefine refugee integration
Japan executes leader, six followers of sarin attack doomesday cult
Support for refugees increases when refugees participate in integration programs
Can lab-crafted embryos save the northern white rhino?
An iconic image challenged the politics of Cuban Americans
(edited)5 days ago
How ironic that “historical trauma” was discovered in post-Holocaust Jews when Native Americans had been suffering from it for 500 years. I worked as a reporter in Indian Country for almost a decade, and nobody gives a damn about Native Americans unless they catch some new disease or kill a white person.
9 days ago
It is also time to demand private prisons or detention centers are removed from the criminal “justice” system process.
9 days ago
Regarding American Indian country remembers when their children were ripped from them, I would like to point out that it is not some historical problem. While the Indian Child Welfare Act was passed in 1978 and rules of implementation in 1979, the Act appeared successful because of the serious socio-economic degradation which had been allowed to occur for years. It appeared successful. However, ICWA is part of the problem. It didn’t stop the state based abuses as data shows. Tax exempt organizations appear to be part of the problem, too. Tax exempts appear because of a problem but the vested interest is self-interest. Why solve a problem when your own existence may be undermined?
As an attorney and researcher, I have written about the problems surrounding ICWA and have suggested an alternative. ICWA is not triggered when a parent voluntarily sets up a legal Guardianship before state intervention occurs. In fact, legal guardianship is expressly carved out from triggering ICWA. Find out why at my website is http://www.educationalfamilyestateapps.com. Look under “Our Products” and “American Indian probate” for greater details. Legal education is empowerment.
17 days ago
Here is a letter anyone can send to their government representatives, feel free to use. Information on how to contact your representative is in the comments:
Dear [Senator, Congressman/woman etc],
In 1978 The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) was enacted in response to a crisis that had been affecting American Indian and Alaska Native children, families, and tribes for decades. Studies revealed that large numbers of Native children were being separated from their parents, extended families, and communities by state child welfare and private adoption agencies. In fact, research found that 25%–35% of all Native children were being removed; of these, 85% were placed outside of their families and communities—even when fit and willing relatives were available. Congressional testimony documented the devastating impact this was having upon Native children, families, and tribes. The intent of Congress under ICWA was to “protect the best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families” (25 U.S.C. § 1902).
In the United States, today, right now, there are countless children being targeted and seized from their parents based on the color of their skin, their original language, and their country origin. We are witnessing thousands of parents being forcibly, painfully, separated from their children. Authorities refuse to disclose any details of the location of individual children to their parents or anyone else.
This is not a Republican issue or a Democrat issue or a liberal issue or a conservative issue. This is a human issue. This is this country repeating history by targeting children of color once again and I believe we have a spiritual responsibility to stand for our suffering brothers and sisters and their children and to raise our voices, sanely, and peacefully for them because they cannot do it for themselves. I believe in my heart we must stand, and we must stand now. Our nation needs awareness of what has been done in the past and what is going on now in order to raise the consciousness of the U.S. and to stop further inhumanities.
On May 29th, during a Senate committee hearing late last month, Steven Wagner, an official with the Department of Health and Human Services, testified that the federal agency had lost track of 1,475 children who had crossed the U.S.-Mexico border on their own (that is, unaccompanied by adults) and subsequently were placed with adult sponsors in the United States.
As of today, June 19, 2018 Trump administration officials said Tuesday that 2,342 children have been separated from 2,206 parents at the US-Mexico border between May 5 and June 9.
Someone needs to be their ICWA.
I respectfully yet urgently ask that this inhumane and vindictive policy is ceased and that you, as our representative do all you can to make sure our country is on the right side of history this time. Immigration policy is important, but human rights should and needs to supersede anyone’s political agendas.